Please Email Me
June 2, 2014
Would the person who left me a message via this site (but with no contact details) this morning about potentially arranging a mating session please email me directly at firstname.lastname@example.org. Either I or Joe will get back to you promptly. I believe we have a number of bucks that would suit.
For a fit buck from England to seed it.
Bitches in winter
Many thanks to the original submitter (from the frozen East).
Does Section 8 of the Slave Welfare regulations stipulate that the members breed their slaves doggie style? Is this style advocated for psychological reasons viz to ensure that slaves are always treated as animals? And also for practical reasons so that slaves will perform well when taken to another Member's breeding pen?
You are spot on. ‘Doggie’ style is the *only* approved position for mating stock owned by all HULOA members. All our slaves are trained to do this and, when being mated in the Breeding Pen, it’s much easier for the overseers to control matters if the stock understands exactly how it is going to be bred. It makes the whole ‘show’ run much more smoothly.
Mating them in this position does also certainly greatly contribute to getting them to understand they are no more than domestic livestock here, no different to any other animals I own. Especially if, for example, a couple of dogs are fucking in the pen and two slaves are waiting to go on next, knowing they will be mated in *exactly* the same position, using the same procedure, as their canine predecessors. They are *not* engaging in an act of private sexual pleasure, as free people do, but rather they are being bred naked in full public view - by their owner - as part of the stock maintenance programme. Also, slaves are required to perform sexually - as either a ‘dog’ or a ‘bitch’ - when directed by their owner or an overseer and *not* at a moment of their own choosing. This also underscores the difference between owned slave stock and free people, of course. And, to remind you, a slave will be severely punished for *any* sexual activity that is unauthorised/unsupervised (Section #5 [Sexual Offences] of the Slave Penal Code refers).
And yes, as I have personally experienced recently, it really does help when taking a buck to be mated with a third party’s slave.
Hope this has answered your question, but if not, please let me know.
Thanks for being so forthcoming on the subject of informal corporal punishment. As you can see from my questions, I find the subject fascinating! So Corbin got caned 11 times in around 20 weeks, which is more than once a fortnight! Is this unusual, or are the others caned as frequently? And is this in addition to spankings?
It is out of the ordinary, yes. 757-583-471 (pet name: Corbin) has received the number of canings that it has simply because it is also physically supervised during the week, unlike any of the other stock. The others are usually only physically disciplined by one of us when they are on the farm.
757-583-471’s punishments were, I assume, in addition to any spankings it might also have received from Nick or Matt as we do not record those.
Since all the BSP bucks are required to piss like dogs, do these bucks pee through their unretracted 4skins? Or are they allowed to use a hand to peel back a 4skin for a pee? Wouldn't this be hygienic especially for the bucks with a long & tapered 4skin overhang?
They most certainly do *not* use their hands in any way when urinating. If I - or the overseers - saw that the buck in question would get a sharp smack across its rump in punishment. There are just two acceptable ways for them to urinate -
- In the ‘good squat’ position, which is basically squatting down on their haunches but leaning forward with their weight on their front paws (hands). They should arch their back, like a dog, and push their behind out too. This is how they are taught to defecate as well.
- On all fours, in which case they may raise a hind leg if near a bush, tree or post.
Most times they are on the lead for this too.
Bucks with a foreskin - the majority - are given permission to clean this when they have a supervised shower (see previous entries).
Good evening, Are you reviewing the take on of any new slaves at the moment and of so can we see pics or can you tell us about them. be good to follow there journey. John in Blackpool
Hi and thanks for your question, John. I have a few irons in the fire now from potential new bucks but, sadly, nothing at all from what we *really* need here to balance the herd: a new bitch (or two).
if anything looks as if it is getting serious, I will let you know.
Antony has a good point about the trimming of certain bucks' body hairs. E.g an Owner could spare snippets of growing blond armpit & pubic hair to prove that his buck is a natural blond! Wont this practice have a good effect for the appearance & value of a buck? Especially in the Arab world & also for the breeders of human livestock?
Must admit I have never thought of this. Can’t see much of a need for it personally, but it’s a thought. Thanks for taking the time to write!
Thank you for your very comprehensive reply about judicial corporal punishment on your plantation. In an earlier post, you said that Nick had put a whipping bench in Corbin's back bedroom. As this cannot be used for public whippings, can you please tell us how often Corbin is caned there, and how severe these canings are compared with official judicial punishments?
You’re very welcome and thanks for this follow-up question. I have just checked 53-year-old 757-583-471’s (pet name: Corbin) electronic stock record and it shows that, since January 1, 2014 757-583-471 has been -
- caned 6 times by its owner, Nick.
- caned 5 times by the overseer, Matt.
- Nick has given it a total of 42 strokes of the cane.
- Matt has given it a total of 46 strokes of the cane.
- It has been punished by these two for a variety of infringements of the Slave Penal Code including Disrespect, Unauthorised Masturbation, Indolence, Theft, and Disobedience.
- Its two most severe punishments have both been from Matt, who gave it 12 strokes of the cane across its bare buttocks on two occasions. The first was on Monday, March 10, 2014 for Disobedience (Section #2, Article (i) of the SPC) for failing to lick his trainers fully clean, despite prior warnings. The second was quite recent, on Wednesday, May 21, 2014 for Unauthorised Masturbation ( Section #5, Article (i) of the SPC), when semen stains were discovered on its underwear when it was inspected after work. According to Matt it was obvious it must have been playing with itself without permission. Again, not for the first time, hence the number of strokes Matt gave it. I have seen 757-583-471 here today and the welts from that caning are still quite visible. Matt did a good job.
757-583-471 is lucky in that, because of Nick and Matt, it now enjoys more direct control than any other slave on our books. And, even at the age of 53, it can still improve its performance and obedience when given constant supervision and discipline.
Hope this answers your questions. If not, please let me know.